The results portrayed on this page were dependent on the fact of each case and that the results will differ if based on different facts.
Branfman Mayfield Bustarde Reichenthal, LLP is pleased to announce that it secured a $1,624,320 jury verdict for the plaintiff in an employment discrimination case
The firm obtained an arbitration award on behalf of the petitioner after a 3-day arbitration hearing arising out of defective goods ordered from a foreign manufacturing company. That award was later confirmed by the Superior Court in the total amount of $170,811.45.
The firm settled a case where it represented a sales representative company who sold products for a vendor in a large municipal construction project. The sales representative company was sued for claims of intentional interference with contractual relations and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. After discovery was completed and depositions were taken, the case settled in mediation.
The firm settled a case where a borrower on a private promissory note defaulted. The firm represented the defendant. The case was settled confidentially shortly after litigation was filed without the client having to file a response in the lawsuit.
The firm settled a case at a mandatory settlement conference after discovery had been completed and just 6 weeks prior to trial where the plaintiff was claiming unpaid money on a promissory note originating out of the sale of a business. The firm represented the plaintiff and obtained a 5-figure cash settlement.
The firm settled a commercial unlawful detainer action where it represented the defendant tenant. That case was settled confidentially without the client having to file a response in the lawsuit.
The firm settled a case where an employee in the health care industry made claims of false claims, wrongful termination, retaliation, breach of employment contract and violations of the labor code. The firm represented the employee and obtained a pre-litigation confidential settlement.
The firm settled a case between multiple businesses with allegations of trademark infringement, unfair business practices, false advertising, trademark dilution and invasion of the right of publicity. The firm represented a defendant and obtained a pre-litigation confidential settlement.
The firm settled a case in which an employee in a professional industry was accused of embezzlement and fraud. The firm represented the employer and obtained a pre-litigation confidential settlement.
The firm settled a case on behalf of an employee who made claims of violations of the California Family Rights Act and emotional distress. The firm was able to resolve the matter for the employee in a pre-litigation confidential settlement.